|
Establising a Search Engine Marketing Budget
|
Dateline: 06/11/02
|
|
by
Paul J. Bruemmer
|
Many firms don't
have a budget for search engine marketing (SEM). CyberAtlas reported last Fall
that 58 percent of the marketers surveyed allocated less than 1 percent of their
annual marketing budgets to SEM; however, 20 percent allocated 25 percent or more.
The study also
reported 62 percent of marketers received 50 to 75 percent of their visitors from
search engines. So why are so few marketers budgeted for a marketing strategy
that brings both visibility and targeted traffic to convert? Perhaps it has to
do with planning.
Planning
Your Marketing Budget
Research shows
that on average, U. S. corporations allocate 6 percent of gross revenues to their
marketing budgets. The rule of thumb says 4 to 10 percent of gross revenues is
necessary for an effective marketing budget. The amounts allocated range from
1 percent for industrial B2B firms to 10 percent or more for consumer packaged
goods, which can run considerably more with new product intros.
While large corporations
give a lot of thought to budget planning, many small to medium enterprises don't.
Some will estimate sales revenue, cost-of-goods, and other expenses, then allocate
what's left over to the marketing budget. What might work better is to estimate
what your competition is spending and try to match that.
Using an industry
average of 6 percent, your marketing budget for every $1M in gross revenues would
be $60K per year; and $15K (25 percent) would go to SEM. It was fairly easy to
get a ballpark figure, but how do you convince your boss?
Justifying
Expenses to Management
There are several
compelling reasons for validating the SEM allocation in your marketing budget,
to name a few:
- Most users find
Web pages from search engines.
- Search engine
traffic is highly targeted.
- The number of
Web shoppers increases every year.
- SEM is cost effective
compared to other marketing strategies.
- Search engine
text links are good for branding and provide more conversions compared to banner
ads.
We'll elaborate
on these one by one. The most compelling reason is that most visitors come from
search engines.
The 1998 Georgia
Tech GVU User Surveys reported 85 percent of respondents found Web pages from
search engines. Since then, other studies have reported 50 to 80 percent of Web
site traffic comes from search engines. Both Jupiter Media Metrix and Nielsen/Net
Ratings have reported shoppers use search engines to find product information
online.
Equally compelling
is the fact that search engine traffic is highly targeted. That's because users
initiate their searches for a reason - to find information, products and services.
The 1998 Georgia
Tech GVU User Survey reported 86 percent of respondents were searching with intent
to buy.
Another good reason
for justifying the expense is the fact that the Web continues to grow and the
number of users with Internet access is climbing. This means more traffic on Web
sites, and a good portion of these will be shoppers.
April 2002: Nielsen//NetRatings
reported 498 million people have Internet access worldwide. In the U.S., 66 percent
of adults have Web access. Jupiter Media Metrix recently reported that corporate
spending is on the rise. Ecommerce Times predicted over $1 trillion will be spent
online this year.
You need increased
Web visibility to maintain market share, and SEM is one of the most cost-effective
online marketing strategies you can buy compared to other advertising methods.
Marketing Sherpa
case studies have reported increased revenues of 24% to 500% for companies conducting
SEO campaigns. One case study compared SEO to banner ads and direct mail, reporting
that SEO resulted in higher conversions at a lower cost-per-click and lower cost-per-acquisition.
SEM text links
provide visibility while producing the leads needed for sales conversions.
According to NPD
Group, SEM performs better than banner ads for brand recall, as search engine
text links were more memorable than banner creative. Secondly, the number of online
purchases made on sites found through search listings outperformed those made
through banner ads by a large margin (55% vs. 9%).
Search engine marketing
is proving to be an essential marketing strategy as the latest statistics from
Jupiter-MediaMetrix show that search engine traffic increased rapidly over the
past six months -- up 11 percent with 92.3 million visitors to search sites. Major
search portals increased even more (Yahoo! up 20 percent with 38.4M visitors;
MSN up 16 percent with 42.3M visitors; Google up 54 percent with 34.2M visitors).
Hope this gives
you the information you'll need to establish a marketing budget
and ample justification for including SEM. It's important to differentiate
yourself from the competition, and I can't think of a better way
than through SEM.
About the Author
Paul
J. Bruemmer is the CEO of Web Ignite, a search engine marketing
company founded in 1995. His articles have appeared on ClickZ, B2B
Interactive, MarketingProfs, Marketing Sherpa, New Media, Pandia,
Search Engine Guide, SitePoint, and Traffick.
© 2000-2002 MarketingProfs.com

|